<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Samazon!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skagandwooster.com/sam</link>
	<description>Samantha Webster&#039;s Online Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A level of professionalism. by Sam</title>
		<link>http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=204&#038;cpage=1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=204#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of my viewpoint stems from my time as a UNCC art major. I developed a very, shall we say, selfish attitude with my art. I would listen to what professors would say, but in the end, I made what i wanted. What I saw. What I liked. And there are actually very few pieces that I ended up not happy with. And if I did, I owned up to it.
I like for my art, just like my writing, to be a bit open ended, up for interpretation, but I don&#039;t feel that knowing more about me as the artist forces a certain meaning or viewpoint. It may give some insight, but perhaps it&#039;s because I&#039;m a little nutso and all over the place that I feel like my work can still stand on its own and have multiple meanings.
Sometimes I don&#039;t even know what I mean...actually...that happens a lot. It&#039;s like I get into an artistic blackout and what happens, happens, and I am just left to enjoy the product, with no distinct reason why I felt compelled to do it. I&#039;m not sure if that is a good or bad thing, but I&#039;ll take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of my viewpoint stems from my time as a UNCC art major. I developed a very, shall we say, selfish attitude with my art. I would listen to what professors would say, but in the end, I made what i wanted. What I saw. What I liked. And there are actually very few pieces that I ended up not happy with. And if I did, I owned up to it.<br />
I like for my art, just like my writing, to be a bit open ended, up for interpretation, but I don&#8217;t feel that knowing more about me as the artist forces a certain meaning or viewpoint. It may give some insight, but perhaps it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a little nutso and all over the place that I feel like my work can still stand on its own and have multiple meanings.<br />
Sometimes I don&#8217;t even know what I mean&#8230;actually&#8230;that happens a lot. It&#8217;s like I get into an artistic blackout and what happens, happens, and I am just left to enjoy the product, with no distinct reason why I felt compelled to do it. I&#8217;m not sure if that is a good or bad thing, but I&#8217;ll take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A level of professionalism. by Katie</title>
		<link>http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=204&#038;cpage=1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=204#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to offend the people who buy pretty jewelry , and sometimes that makes me feel like a hypocrite.  A hypocrite who can pay her utility bills, though.  So at least I&#039;m warm, clean and well lit while I worry about being a hypocrite.   =)

&quot;Our personalities are part of what fuels our work, so if we don&#039;t feel free to embrace ourselves and share it with the world....&quot;

While I think it is good art business, to a point,  to share ourselves with the world, I&#039;ve often wondered if allowing our ourselves-our personalities, our opinions- muddies the process of  art becoming art.  

If a piece must communicate with the viewer and form a relationship with that viewer in order to become art, then is it cheating to inject anything else into that interaction; to offer more information than the piece may offer by itself?   Often, once we&#039;ve heard an artist speak, once we&#039;ve read about him.....we feel more of a connection with the piece than we did before the artist, as a person, entered into the relationship.  Is artist-as-accoutrement-to-his-art right for our art?

I know that my work means more to some because it&#039;s MY work, and they admire me.  As an artist, I&#039;m torn about that.  In a perfect world, I feel my work should stand all on its own; it should be just as successful without its ties to Katie Stein.  In reality, there are a lot of brilliant artists who never make a mark on the art world because of their failure to promote themselves.  

If there was a Venn diagram showing the overlap of good business practice, personal authenticity, and the ethics or art in blogging, I wonder if ethics in art would have much space.  Hmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to offend the people who buy pretty jewelry , and sometimes that makes me feel like a hypocrite.  A hypocrite who can pay her utility bills, though.  So at least I&#8217;m warm, clean and well lit while I worry about being a hypocrite.   =)</p>
<p>&#8220;Our personalities are part of what fuels our work, so if we don&#8217;t feel free to embrace ourselves and share it with the world&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I think it is good art business, to a point,  to share ourselves with the world, I&#8217;ve often wondered if allowing our ourselves-our personalities, our opinions- muddies the process of  art becoming art.  </p>
<p>If a piece must communicate with the viewer and form a relationship with that viewer in order to become art, then is it cheating to inject anything else into that interaction; to offer more information than the piece may offer by itself?   Often, once we&#8217;ve heard an artist speak, once we&#8217;ve read about him&#8230;..we feel more of a connection with the piece than we did before the artist, as a person, entered into the relationship.  Is artist-as-accoutrement-to-his-art right for our art?</p>
<p>I know that my work means more to some because it&#8217;s MY work, and they admire me.  As an artist, I&#8217;m torn about that.  In a perfect world, I feel my work should stand all on its own; it should be just as successful without its ties to Katie Stein.  In reality, there are a lot of brilliant artists who never make a mark on the art world because of their failure to promote themselves.  </p>
<p>If there was a Venn diagram showing the overlap of good business practice, personal authenticity, and the ethics or art in blogging, I wonder if ethics in art would have much space.  Hmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seven Years Bad Luck by Seven Years Bad Luck &#124; World Global</title>
		<link>http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Years Bad Luck &#124; World Global</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skagandwooster.com/sam/?p=192#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] More:  Seven Years Bad Luck [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:  Seven Years Bad Luck [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
